ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantifying improvement of psychotic symptoms in clozapine-treated schizophrenia: clinical note analysis with large language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Symptoms of schizophrenia are often reflected in patients' speech. Natural language processing (NLP) approaches enable quantitative assessment of language-related symptoms in schizophrenia. Previous applications have primarily focused on acute psychopathology or predicting the onset or relapse of psychosis rather than treatment-related improvements. Although electronic health records (EHRs) contain rich longitudinal data, unstructured notes hinder structured quantifications. We applied recent large language models (LLMs) to evaluate symptoms based on speech content recorded in EHRs. We analyzed 5,275 clinical notes from 30 patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia undergoing clozapine treatment. Three state-of-the-art LLMs rated according to the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Complementary analysis included parts-of-speech (POS), bag-of-words (BoW), bigram and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) analyses. LLM-based BPRS ratings revealed significant decreases in Anxiety, Conceptual Disorganization, Suspiciousness, Unusual Thought Content, Hallucinatory behavior, and Depressive Mood during clozapine treatment. POS analysis indicated an increased use of adjectives per sentence, while LIWC analysis revealed more positive emotional expressions during the later phase of treatment. These findings demonstrate that LLMs can extract clinically meaningful symptom information from unstructured clinical text and capture treatment-related changes in psychosis. This approach premises a low-burden method for supporting clinical judgment using routinely collected EHR data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.