ArticleScientific reports2026
Utilization patterns and perceived effectiveness of manual therapy for low back pain among Saudi physical therapists: a national cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and manual therapy (MT) is commonly used in its management. However, utilization patterns and perceived effectiveness vary according to training and clinical context, with limited national-level evidence describing how Saudi physical therapists apply MT in routine LBP care. To examine national patterns of MT utilization for LBP among licensed Saudi physical therapists, to identify commonly applied techniques, and to evaluate professional and educational factors associated with perceived effectiveness and frequency of use. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from January to March 2025 using a structured online questionnaire distributed nationwide via professional and social-media platforms. Eligible participants were Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS)-licensed physical therapists actively managing LBP. The questionnaire assessed demographics, MT training exposure, frequency and type of MT use, perceived effectiveness, and outcome-measurement practices. Content validity was confirmed by six experts (S-CVI/Avg = 0.96). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Spearman's rho correlation, and multivariable ordinal logistic regression (SPSS v28; α < 0.05). Of 182 responses received, 173 met the inclusion criteria. Most participants reported using MT for LBP management, with 89% employing it at least occasionally and 20% reporting routine use. MT was rated as important or very important by 87.9% of respondents, and more than half assigned a perceived usefulness score ≥ 6/10. Greater exposure to MT training was independently associated with higher MT utilization and stronger perceived effectiveness (p < 0.001; Nagelkerke R² = 0.47), whereas years of experience and clinical specialization were not significantly associated. MT is widely used and positively perceived by Saudi physical therapists managing LBP. Variability in its utilization and perceived effectiveness appears primarily related to differences in training exposure. These findings describe current practice patterns and professional perceptions and may inform future educational planning, without inferring clinical effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.