ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2026
Exploration of the Feasibility of One-Day Dual-Low-Activity
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe standard 2-day dual-tracer PET protocol provides more information but is time consuming. Thus, this study aimed to validate the feasibility of 1-day PROCEDURES: Fourteen NENs patients who underwent 1-day
resultsThe 1-day protocol detected 39 out of 40 lesions in 14 patients, while the 2-day protocol detected 65 out of 66 lesions in 14 patients. No significant differences were observed in lesion detection (all P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in diagnostic confidence between the 1-day protocol and the 2-day protocol for
conclusionThe 1-day
Indexed as
Identifiers
41680383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.