ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid LSTM-GRU framework for lung cancer classification using GWO-WOA algorithm for hyperparameter tuning and BPSO for feature selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative study of quantum-inspired PSO and EA with their binary variants for heart disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimized Machine Learning Pipeline for Lung Cancer Classification: Feature Reduction and Hyperparameter Tuning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multi-model prediction of a stage-specific prognosis for colorectal cancer using attention-driven deep ensemble learning on genomic profiling data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Feature fusion and WOA-GWO optimization for Alzheimer's disease detection with sparse EEG channels.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early identification of lung cancer using questionnaire-based data offers a low-cost, non-invasive pathway to assist clinical decision-making. However, such datasets often contain redundant, noisy, and imbalanced attributes that limit the performance of traditional classifiers. This study introduces a hybrid LSTM-GRU framework optimized using a Grey Wolf-Whale Optimization (GWO-WOA) algorithm for hyperparameter tuning and Binary Particle Swarm Optimization (BPSO) for feature selection. Two public lung cancer datasets sourced from the Kaggle repository were employed: the first comprising 309 samples and the second containing 3000 samples. For both datasets, the preprocessing pipeline included missing-value imputation, categorical encoding, outlier removal, and z-score normalization to ensure feature consistency. Datasets were then split into 70%, 20%, and 10% subsets for training, validation, and testing, respectively. BPSO effectively selected the most informative features that contribute to accurate diagnosis. At the same time, GWO-WOA refined key hyperparameters, such as the learning rate, hidden units, and layer depth, of the hybrid architecture. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed GWO-WOA-LSTM-GRU model, achieving 100.00% accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score on the 309-sample dataset, and 99.33% accuracy/F1 (precision: 99.34%, recall: 99.33%) on the 3000-sample dataset. In comparison, tuned single models-LSTM, GRU, CNN, and SVM-achieved accuracies ranging from 77.42 to 98.33%. These findings confirm that integrating metaheuristic optimization and hybrid recurrent networks enhances the robustness and generalization capabilities of lung cancer classification systems across diverse datasets, offering a reliable tool for early detection and clinical risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.