ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive bit placement for dual biometric using signature and finger print for DWT-DCT picture steganography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Providing biometric data through multimedia has made it difficult to ensure secure communication and authentication in the digital age. This research showcases an advanced dual-biometric steganographic system that incorporates signature and fingerprint characteristics in a single cover image using Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and Disputed Cosine Transform (DCT). An Adaptive Bit Placement (ABP) approach is proposed, which intelligently selects embedding positions by considering coefficient significance and biometric importance to balance imperceptibility, robustness, and embedding.To verify its efficacy, the system was compared to standard benchmark images and provided with live biometric data samples. The experimental outcomes demonstrate that the proposed ABP-based Dual Biometric Steganography (ABPDBS) is significantly superior to current methods. While the current methods show Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) values between 34 and 39 dB and Structural Similarity Index Measurement (SSIM) scores between 0.90 and 0.96, and embedding capacities below 0.30 bpp, the proposed approach yields average PSNR improvements of 22–36% (47.31-50.76dB), mean value of SSIM improvements of 2–11% (0.9748 with maximum reach to 0.9995) and an embedding capacity increases of 16% (0.33 bpp). Proposed method also provides overall better integration performance in these new techniques than those previously described. These results imply that the system is highly imperceptible; resilient to typical signal processing attacks, and has greater payload strength. In general, this research presents a secure and efficient framework for dual-biometric embedding which can enhance multimodal authentication systems suitable for high-security scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.