ArticleScientific reports2026
Impact of thermal and physiological denoising on laminar functional connectivity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The characterization of the direction of information flow between cortical areas via layer functional connectivity (FC) is of interest for many neuroscientific applications. Most laminar fMRI acquisitions are in the thermal-noise dominated regime due to spatial resolution requirements. However, laminar FC estimates using gradient-echo BOLD might be particularly biased by physiological sources of noise which are amplified by the draining vein effect. In this work, we aimed at assessing whether thermal and physiological denoising can be helpful in reducing biases in laminar functional connectivity studies. We tested NORDIC, RETROICOR, and aCompCor on a dataset acquired at 7T with a resolution of 0.8 × 0.8 × 1.5 mm3 and evaluated the following metrics on a laminar basis after each denoising step: temporal standard deviation (tSD), coefficient of variation (CoV), fluctuation amplitude (FA) and seed-based functional connectivity strength of the primary motor cortex (M1) with premotor (PM) and somatosensory (S1) regions. We found that NORDIC had the largest impact on the metrics considered, mostly in deeper laminae. The application of physiological denoising, especially aCompCor, following NORDIC had the largest effect on upper laminae, in line with the fact that they are more affected by physiological noise than the deeper laminae. The application of NORDIC and aCompCor resulted in laminar functional connectivity results pointing to a stronger connectivity of upper M1 laminae to S1 than lower M1 laminae to S1, and to a reduction in the upper-layer bias in the connectivity to PM. Therefore, both thermal and physiological denoising represent important steps to increase sensitivity and reduce the vascular bias of laminar fMRI data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.