ReviewBritish journal of cancer2026
Paediatric Therapeutic Development Workshop on rhabdoid tumours.
Review in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current treatment landscape and translational priorities in malignant rhabdoid tumor of the kidney.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rhabdoid tumours (RT) are malignancies of the central nervous system, kidneys, liver and soft tissues that most commonly affect very young children with survival rates below 30% in high-risk cohorts. Treatment entails surgery, intensive chemotherapy and radiotherapy, associated with substantial short- and long-term toxicities. There is an unmet need to develop targeted therapies for RT to improve patient outcomes and mitigate the toxicities of current therapy. Detailed research followed by a workshop had the objective of enabling the development of targeted therapeutics for RT. Given the inherent commonality of their biology (i.e. biallelic inactivation of SMARCB1 or more rarely SMARCA4) the therapeutic approach should be similar for intra-cranial and extra-cranial tumours. DDB1-CUL4-associated factor 5 is a promising target, and the development of small molecule binders/degraders is a priority. Enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2) degraders may have greater therapeutic potential than inhibitors. Fibroblast growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitors may have value in subgroups. Mouse double minute 2 homologue (MDM2) is a priority target for novel therapeutic development and combination trials. Combinations of EZH2, MDM2 inhibitors and selective inhibitors of nuclear export should be evaluated robustly preclinically and drive early clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.