ArticleScientific reports2026
Ensemble learning for air quality index prediction: integrating gradient boosting, XGBoost, and stacking with SHAP-based interpretability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing challenge of air pollution in cities requires smart methods to make proper predictions and manage the problem. Although machine learning and deep learning models have contributed greatly to weather and pollution forecasting, the main issue is the real-time flexibility, and scalability in the varying atmospheric conditions. This paper introduces a weighted Voting ensemble model that combines Gradient Boosting (×4), CatBoost (×3), XGBoost (×2) and LightGBM (×1) to improve the accuracy of Air Quality Index (AQI) forecasting. The full preprocessing (complete-case deletion, which retains extremes) and optimization of hyperparameters (GridSearchCV/Optuna, 5-fold CV) were used to enhance the robustness and generalizability of the model. The Taiwan Air Quality Dataset (2016-2024, [Formula: see text] hourly records from 74 stations), 6 major pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], CO), meteorological parameters (wind speed/direction), and 8-h averages) is used to model the data (spatial/temporal IDs are excluded, to allow deployment to a single station). Experimental validation of 60/16/24 splits (random + temporal validation) shows that the ensemble has validation MSE 0.6553 ([Formula: see text] 0.9969), which beats 15 baselines including the deep learning (LSTM MSE 45.4), but has temporal robustness (Δ [Formula: see text]= - 0.0037). Moreover, SHAP is implemented to offer explainability, as it gives more insights into the contribution of features in predicting AQI. The results indicate the promise of interpretable ensemble learning systems to underpin sustainable urban living, reinforce community health programs, and allow interventions in managing air quality in time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.