Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680275›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Ensemble learning for air quality index prediction: integrating gradient boosting, XGBoost, and stacking with SHAP-based interpretability.

Sukhendra Singh, Manoj Kumar, Vishal Sengar, Abhay Kumar, Kumar Abhishek, B M Ahamed Shafeeq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sukhendra SinghDepartment of Information Technology, JSS Academy of Technical Education, Noida, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manoj KumarSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Technology, Bennett University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vishal SengarCivil and Environment Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Abhay KumarCSE, National Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, Bihar, India.
Kumar AbhishekCSE, National Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, Bihar, India. kumar.abhishek@nitp.ac.in.
B M Ahamed ShafeeqManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. ahamed.shafeeq@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing challenge of air pollution in cities requires smart methods to make proper predictions and manage the problem. Although machine learning and deep learning models have contributed greatly to weather and pollution forecasting, the main issue is the real-time flexibility, and scalability in the varying atmospheric conditions. This paper introduces a weighted Voting ensemble model that combines Gradient Boosting (×4), CatBoost (×3), XGBoost (×2) and LightGBM (×1) to improve the accuracy of Air Quality Index (AQI) forecasting. The full preprocessing (complete-case deletion, which retains extremes) and optimization of hyperparameters (GridSearchCV/Optuna, 5-fold CV) were used to enhance the robustness and generalizability of the model. The Taiwan Air Quality Dataset (2016-2024, [Formula: see text] hourly records from 74 stations), 6 major pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], CO), meteorological parameters (wind speed/direction), and 8-h averages) is used to model the data (spatial/temporal IDs are excluded, to allow deployment to a single station). Experimental validation of 60/16/24 splits (random + temporal validation) shows that the ensemble has validation MSE 0.6553 ([Formula: see text] 0.9969), which beats 15 baselines including the deep learning (LSTM MSE 45.4), but has temporal robustness (Δ [Formula: see text]= - 0.0037). Moreover, SHAP is implemented to offer explainability, as it gives more insights into the contribution of features in predicting AQI. The results indicate the promise of interpretable ensemble learning systems to underpin sustainable urban living, reinforce community health programs, and allow interventions in managing air quality in time.

Indexed as

Air quality index (AQI)Ensemble learningFeature engineeringGradient boostingMachine learningPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID41680275
PMCPMC12976265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.