Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680273›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A multi strategy optimization framework using AI digital twins for smart grid carbon emission reduction.

S Sakthivel, M Arivukarasi, G Charulatha, J Nithisha, B Abirami, A K Jaithunbi, V Suresh Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S SakthivelDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India. sakthi0707@gmail.com.
M ArivukarasiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India.
G CharulathaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India.
J NithishaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India.
B AbiramiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India.
A K JaithunbiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India.
V Suresh KumarDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 602105, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research presents an AI-enabled digital twin framework to achieve carbon neutrality in smart grids through optimal management of heterogeneous energy storage systems. The proposed structure integrates battery, thermal, and hydrogen storage technologies with AI-driven forecasting models to address the challenge of renewable integration, while maintaining grid stability and economic viability. This paper presents a comparative analysis of three distinct optimization methodologies, like a rule-based (RB) heuristic approach, Model Predictive Control (MPC) with look-ahead capability, and a multi-objective Genetic Algorithm (GA). Simulation results that demonstrate the AI-optimized multi-energy storage (MES) integration significantly enhance the renewable utilization and reduce carbon emissions by approximately 30% compared to conventional approaches. Specifically, the MPC achieves a 29.9% reduction in carbon footprint (1741.1 kgCO₂ vs. 2485.2 kgCO₂ baseline) with corresponding operational cost savings of 30%, while GA shows a comparable 28.2% improvement. The comparative analysis discloses a critical trade-off between computational complexity, optimization performance, and practical implementability, with MPC emerging as a balanced method for a real-world application. This work has contributed to sustainable energy systems by providing a comprehensive framework for MES optimization, imparting treasured insights for grid operators and policymakers. The outcomes highlight the important role of AI-enabled digital twin in designing next-generation smart grid infrastructure, which is capable for supporting excessive renewable penetration at the same time as ensuring reliability and sustainable economic growth.

Indexed as

AI optimizationCarbon neutral smart gridsDigital twinModel predictive controlMulti energy storageRenewable energy

Identifiers

PMID41680273
PMCPMC12976377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.