ArticleScientific reports2026
Tailoring electron bunch quality in laser-plasma acceleration: a comparative study of Bessel-Gaussian and Gaussian laser profiles under variable plasma density geometries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Controlling electron injection and beam quality in laser wakefield acceleration (LWFA) requires coordinated manipulation of both the driving laser structure and the plasma density profile. In this work, a systematic particle-in-cell (PIC) study is performed to investigate how longitudinal plasma density tailoring, characterized by the high-density plateau length [Formula: see text], interacts with laser pulse shaping to regulate electron injection and final beam properties. Gaussian (G) and zeroth-order Bessel-Gaussian (BG) laser pulses are compared under strictly equal total laser-energy conditions using multi-section plasma density profiles. The simulations show that BG pulses promote extended and repeated injection, resulting in higher trapped charge across all investigated values of [Formula: see text]. This enhancement is accompanied by increased beam loading, which reduces the effective accelerating field and limits the attainable peak energy. In contrast, G pulses favor more localized injection with lower trapped charge but higher peak energy and improved spectral quality, particularly when the high-density plateau is removed ([Formula: see text]). Importantly, [Formula: see text] is identified as a robust and practical control parameter for tuning injection duration and balancing charge-energy trade-offs for both laser drivers. Despite the distinct injection dynamics, no fundamental differences in transverse emittance behavior are observed between G and BG pulses for identical plasma configurations. Instead, the emittance evolution is governed by the timing and spatial localization of injected electrons, as controlled by the tailored density geometry. These results establish a design-oriented framework in which moderate laser pulse shaping, combined with longitudinal plasma density tailoring, provides complementary and experimentally accessible pathways for optimizing beam parameters in LWFA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.