ArticleScientific reports2026
Modified cell-to-cell method for slim tube test simulation considering the porous media effect.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study estimates the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) for a hydrocarbon gas injection project using integrated laboratory and simulation approaches. The MMP was first determined experimentally via a slim tube displacement test. Concurrently, a modified cell-to-cell simulation (CCS) model was developed, incorporating key corrections to account for porous media effects. These modifications included: adjusting the Peng–Robinson equation of state for a porous medium, improving the critical properties shift equation, incorporating capillary pressure into vapor–liquid equilibrium calculations, and refining fluid transfer criteria. The simulation used the permeability-to-porosity ratio to represent the porous medium’s influence on phase behavior. Results demonstrate that a decreasing permeability-to-porosity ratio reduces the MMP. This effect is particularly significant in tight reservoirs (with ratios below 10), indicating that miscibility can be achieved more readily in such formations compared to conventional reservoirs. The modified CCS method provides an efficient and reliable tool for MMP estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.