ArticleScientific reports2026
Phage-antibiotic synergistic effect for treating cutaneous wounds infections caused by MRSA and the assessment of wound healing biomarkers in a rabbit model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regenerative Microbiology: Harnessing Bacterial Antagonism and Spatiotemporal Signaling for Diabetic Wound Repair.Smart medicine · 2026Review
- Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Infections: Therapeutic Potential, Limitations and Clinical Challenges.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A comprehensive review of emerging therapeutic strategies against methicillin-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a significant challenge in managing wound infections. Bacteriophage therapy has emerged as a promising alternative or adjunct to traditional antibiotics. This study evaluated the therapeutic potential of a temperate, uncharacterized phage preparation induced from the S. aureus reference strain ATCC 25,923 using mitomycin C (MitC) for topical treatment of superficial MRSA-infected wounds in a rabbit model, both alone and combined with vancomycin. Key wound healing markers (collagen 1, MMP1, PDGF, FGF2) and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α) were assessed alongside immunohistochemical analysis of IL-6 and TNF-α expression. The induced lysogenic phage demonstrated lytic activity against MRSA, resulting in a wound healing rate of 87.89%, which increased to 93.63% with combined vancomycin treatment. Enhanced healing correlated with elevated collagen, PDGF, and FGF2 expression and significant downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (p < 0.0001). Immunohistochemistry confirmed decreased IL-6 and TNF-α expression in wound inflammatory cells. These findings provide preliminary in vivo evidence supporting phage-antibiotic synergy for treating MRSA wounds. Although promising, the phage preparation remains uncharacterized, limiting reproducibility and translational readiness. Further research is needed to characterize active phage components, evaluate safety, and optimize therapeutic protocols before clinical application. This study pioneers the in vivo use of temperate phages combined with antibiotics for MRSA wound treatment, addressing antibiotic resistance issues by improving wound closure, promoting healing factor expression, and reducing inflammation. These results lay an important foundation for developing novel therapies against resistant bacterial infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.