Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680226›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparative evaluation of QuEChERS and the 'dilute and shoot' QuPPe extraction methods coupled with LC-MS/MS for the analysis of mepiquat residue in sweet potatoes: addressing residual soil impact on recovery efficiency.

Mohamed Wageed, Hend A Mahmoud, M I Abdel-Megeed, Ramadan Sayed, Hassan A El-Gammal, Mostafa Soliman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamed WageedAgricultural Research Center, Central Laboratory of residue Analysis of Pesticides and Heavy Metals in Foods (QCAP), Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, 7 Nadi El Said St., Dokki, Giza, 12311, Egypt.
Hend A MahmoudAgricultural Research Center, Central Laboratory of residue Analysis of Pesticides and Heavy Metals in Foods (QCAP), Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, 7 Nadi El Said St., Dokki, Giza, 12311, Egypt.
M I Abdel-MegeedPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ramadan SayedAgricultural Research Center, Central Laboratory of residue Analysis of Pesticides and Heavy Metals in Foods (QCAP), Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, 7 Nadi El Said St., Dokki, Giza, 12311, Egypt.
Hassan A El-GammalAgricultural Research Center, Central Laboratory of residue Analysis of Pesticides and Heavy Metals in Foods (QCAP), Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, 7 Nadi El Said St., Dokki, Giza, 12311, Egypt.
Mostafa SolimanAgricultural Research Center, Central Laboratory of residue Analysis of Pesticides and Heavy Metals in Foods (QCAP), Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, 7 Nadi El Said St., Dokki, Giza, 12311, Egypt. mostafa.soliman@qcap-egypt.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3181-8767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mepiquat (MPQ) is a quaternary ammonium salt widely used as a growth regulator in agriculture. A recent report from the European Union Reference Laboratory for Single Residue Methods (EURL SRM) reported MPQ residues in Egyptian sweet potatoes at levels that raised some concern. Hence, this study aimed to develop and validate a fast, effective extraction method coupled with LC-MS/MS for MPQ analysis in Egypt. Initially, the QuEChERS citrate buffered method was tested, but it showed significant fluctuation in spike recovery (30%-72%). A systematic investigation revealed that recovery differed depending on the amount of residual soil in the sweet potato samples. Two key observations were made: (1) Clay loam negatively affected recovery more than sandy loam, and (2) the "dilute and shoot" Quick Polar Pesticides (QuPPe) method was less impacted by residual soil. By applying exponential decay equation modelling, it was proved that residual soil can remain on the sweet potato even after 10 min washing. A study on the effect of washing for 10 min was done using real contaminated samples and it showed that about 30% of the incurred pesticide was lost. Hence, dry scrubbing was used for the removal of the soil on the sweet potato, in addition to the QuPPe method for sample extraction. This provides a predictive framework for understanding how residual soil influences recovery, which could be extended to other polar pesticides and root crops. The QuPPe method was validated for specificity, selectivity, accuracy, and precision, ensuring its suitability for quantitative MPQ analysis in sweet potatoes. A survey of 30 samples showed that only four tested positives for MPQ, with one exceeding the maximum residue limits.

Indexed as

Ipomoea batatasPesticide ResiduesPiperidinesLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometrySoilSolventsTandem Mass SpectrometrymepiquatPesticide ResiduesPiperidinesSoilSolventsLC-MS/MSMepiquatQuEChERSQuPPeSoilSweet potatoes

Identifiers

PMID41680226
PMCPMC12905235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.