ArticleScientific data2026
Global daily 9 km remotely sensed soil moisture (2015-2025) with microwave radiative transfer-guided learning.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global daily 9 km remotely sensed soil moisture (2015-2025) with microwave radiative transfer-guided learning.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate estimation of surface soil moisture (SM) in terrestrial ecosystems is essential for understanding hydroclimate dynamics. The L-band Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission provides 9-km global daily surface SM by using a microwave radiative transfer model (RTM)-based algorithm. However, the accuracy of SMAP SM is limited in regions with dense vegetation cover and complex surface conditions, due to the empirical parameterization and oversimplified radiative transfer processes. To overcome the limitations, we developed a Process-Guided Machine Learning (PGML) framework to integrate RTM theories and deep learning to predict global daily surface 9-km SM from April 2015 to June 2025. Informed by domain knowledge, we developed the PGML model structure using RTM and hydrological theories, designed a Kling-Gupta efficiency-based cost function, pretrained it with RTM simulations, and fine-tuned it with in-situ measurements. The independent validation shows that PGML SM has strong agreement with in-situ measurements (R = 0.868 and unbiased RMSE = 0.054 m
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.