SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2026
Depression and anxiety in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization.
Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with interstitial lung diseases: A narrative review of epidemiology, clinical impact, and integrated care strategies.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the prevalence of depression and anxiety in interstitial lung disease (ILD) and reveal whether ILD is causally associated with depression and anxiety via Mendelian randomization (MR).
methodsEligible studies were identified and selected from Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus. The pooled prevalence of depression and anxiety in ILD, as well as the clinical characteristics of ILD with depression or anxiety, were assessed. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses and meta-regression were applied for heterogeneity assessments. Data of MR analysis were derived from the UK biobank and Finngen cohort, and the inverse variance weighting approach was selected as the main approach for causality evaluation.
resultsA total of 35 studies were included in this meta-analysis, with 34 studies reporting depression in ILD and 21 reporting anxiety in ILD. The pooled prevalence of depression and anxiety in ILD were 22% (95% CI 17%, 26%, I
conclusionAlthough the prevalence of depression and anxiety were high in patients with ILD, no causal relationship was observed. Future studies are needed to investigate the intricate association between ILD and mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.