ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2026
Impact of routine upright clavicle radiographs on clavicle fracture management.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to determine whether increased vertical displacement on upright clavicle radiographs (UCR) compared with supine clavicle radiographs (SCR) influenced the decision to operate.
methodsAdult patients with clavicle fractures identified on initial SCR or computed tomography scans during primary evaluation at a level 1 trauma center from July 2021 to November 2023 were included. The patients also underwent UCR. Exclusion criteria were patients with chronic or pathologic fractures, inadequate imaging, or incomplete documentation. Increases in vertical displacement from SCR to UCR were measured, and we recorded how often these increases on UCR prompted surgical management.
resultsOverall, 160 patients (average age 47.0 years; 70% male) met the inclusion criteria. Most of the study population was managed nonoperatively (90%), with only 16 patients (10%) managed surgically. Only two of the 160 patients (1.3%) underwent surgical intervention based primarily on increased vertical displacement on UCR. With an average change of 4.5 mm (95% CI, 3.5-6.6 mm) between SCR and UCR for patients managed nonoperatively, and 5.1 mm (95% CI, 2.7-7.5 mm) for those managed operatively. There was no significant difference in management based on UCR (P=0.71). Subgroup analysis, stratifying patients by either ≥1 cm or <1 cm of displacement, found there was still no statistically significant change in SCR and UCR (P=0.44).
conclusionsInpatient UCR rarely alters the management of clavicle fractures at our institution, indicating that its use is best reserved for case-by-case consideration. Level of evidence: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.