ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2026
Effectiveness of electromyography biofeedback training on scapular kinematics and muscle activation in patients with scapular dyskinesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to determine the effectiveness of electromyography (EMG) biofeedback training on scapular kinematics and/or muscle activation in patients with scapular dyskinesis (SD) associated with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS).
methodsAn electronic search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, CENTRAL, and PEDro databases. Eligibility criteria comprised randomized clinical trials investigating the effects of adding EMG biofeedback training to scapular-focused exercises on scapular kinematics and/or muscle activation in patients with SD associated with SIS. Data were pooled using a Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects method or Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).
resultsFour trials met the eligibility criteria. The mean difference (MD) for upward rotation was 1.13° (P=0.07), and that for downward rotation was 1.2° (P=0.08). The MDs for muscle activation of the lower trapezius during scapular plane elevation and descending movements were 7.22% (P=0.010) and 2.26% (P<0.001), respectively. The MDs for the muscle balance ratios of the upper/lower trapezius and upper trapezius/serratus anterior were 0.11% (P=0.95) and 0.15% (P=0.04), respectively. All differences favored the EMG biofeedback plus scapular-focused exercises group.
conclusionsIn the short-term, adding EMG biofeedback training to scapular-focused exercises resulted in significant differences only in lower trapezius activity. Conversely, the results were inconclusive regarding improvements in scapular kinematics and changes in the activation of other scapular muscles. The quality of evidence ranged from very low to high according to GRADE rating, suggesting that the effect of EMG biofeedback might not be captured in this study. Level of evidence: I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.