ReviewClinics in shoulder and elbow2026
Surgical management of internal impingement in overhead athletes: a systematic review.
Review in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to review all published evidence on the surgical management of internal impingement and associated conditions in athletes of overhead sports.
methodsOur search included studies reporting outcomes of any surgical intervention on shoulder internal impingement and its sequelae in overhead athletes. The primary outcome was return to sport at pre-injury level or higher in the main text (RTS+). Secondary outcomes included return to sport at any level (RTS), shoulder function, and complications. No quantitative analyses were possible due to the nature of the evidence included.
resultsForty-two observational studies were eligible. They included 1,420 overhead athletes with a mean age of 27.3 years. RTS+ across all surgical procedures ranged from 25% to 94%. In patients treated with debridement of articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears, the RTS+ ranged from 50% to 85%, and in those who underwent posterior glenoidplasty for glenoid spurs, it ranged from 55% to 63.6%. Comparative studies for superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) tears demonstrated similar RTS+ after open subpectoral tenodesis and arthroscopic SLAP repair. RTS+ after the two procedures in all observational studies ranged from 35% to 100% and 54.2% to 100%, respectively. RTS+ after capsulorrhaphy, when performed concomitantly with other procedures, ranged from 25% to 93%.
conclusionsOutcomes associated with the surgical management of internal impingement are variable. Surgical decision-making should prioritize patient-specific factors following unsuccessful conservative management. We provide surgical recommendations and considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.