Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41679948›Full record

ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2026

Approach to mallet finger injury: Practical guide for Canadian primary care physicians.

Vincent Dinh, Marisa Market, Kevin Cheung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vincent DinhMedical student at the University of Ottawa in Ontario.
Marisa MarketFamily physician and Adjunct Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at Western University in London, Ont.
Kevin CheungPlastic and reconstructive surgeon at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and Associate Professor in the Department of Surgery at the University of Ottawa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide primary care physicians with an evidence-based approach to recognizing and managing mallet finger injuries. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar using relevant key words and subject headings. Recommendations were categorized based on clinical evidence and expert opinion using a 3-level classification system. MAIN MESSAGE: A mallet finger injury commonly occurs after an axial load, resulting in avulsion of the extensor tendon from the distal phalanx. This may occur with or without an avulsion fracture. Diagnosis is made clinically, with x-ray scans used to assess for an associated fracture and joint alignment. Nonsurgical management with continuous splinting for 6 to 8 weeks is the standard of care and achieves excellent outcomes even in cases of delayed presentation. Surgery referral may be considered for avulsion fractures resulting in joint subluxation, open injuries, and failure of conservative management. Untreated mallet finger injuries can lead to chronic swan-neck deformities, which may limit function.

conclusionMallet finger injuries may be easily recognized and managed in the primary care settings, resulting in excellent patient outcomes without the need for specialist referral. This review should equip primary care physicians with confidence in diagnosing a mallet finger injury, initiating appropriate splinting, providing patient education, and recognizing indications for surgical referral.

Indexed as

Finger InjuriesHand Deformities, AcquiredTendon InjuriesCanadaHumansPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareSplints

Identifiers

PMID41679948
PMCPMC12898726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.