ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2026
2025 update of the Greig Health Record: Part 2-what's controversial?
Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review a selection of new resources and updated recommendations from the third update of the Greig Health Record (GHR). SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Pediatric preventive care literature was reviewed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Systematic reviews of subtopics were evaluated where available. Guidance and supporting evidence were reviewed from the Canadian Paediatric Society, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, the United States Preventive Services Task Force, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MAIN MESSAGE: Recommendations for best practice are based on available evidence and guidance from various agencies; yet conflicting recommendations are often given. The GHR identifies 6 of these conflicts in pediatric preventive care recommendations, including depression screening; cannabis use counselling and screening; dietary recommendations for beverage selection and consumption of plant-based proteins; testicular self-examination; and meningococcal vaccination timing.
conclusionClinicians are advised to consider options for practice as they apply to their own patients and to be aware of changing guidance as new evidence emerges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.