Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41679920›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2026

MIRD Pamphlet No. 34, Part 1: MIRDct-A Customizable Software Tool for CT Dosimetry.

Juan Camilo Ocampo Ramos, Cameron Kofler, Robert Dawson, Jared Baggett, Laura E Dinwiddie, Sean J Domal, Lukas M Carter, Harry Marquis, Gunjan Kayal, Pat B Zanzonico and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. MIRD Pamphlet No. 34, Part 2: Benchmarking of MIRDct Software for CT Organ Dose Estimation.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. MIRD Pamphlet No. 34, Part 1: MIRDct-A Customizable Software Tool for CT Dosimetry.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Survey of normalized CTDIJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juan Camilo Ocampo RamosDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Cameron KoflerDepartment of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Robert DawsonMedical Physics Graduate Program, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Jared BaggettMedical Physics Graduate Program, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Laura E DinwiddieJ. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; and.
Sean J DomalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Lukas M CarterDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Harry MarquisDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Gunjan KayalDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Pat B ZanzonicoDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Wesley E BolchMedical Physics Graduate Program, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Adam L KesnerDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; kesnera@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
MIRDCalc – A Community Tool for Deriving and Reporting Patient Organ Doses in Nuclear Medicine, Computed Tomography, and Hybrid ImagingU01EB028234 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BOLCH, WESLEY E, KESNER, ADAM LEON · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB028234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray CT has long played a critical role in diagnostic radiology and is also a fundamental component of hybrid imaging in nuclear medicine, providing essential information for anatomic localization of radiopharmaceutical uptake and attenuation correction for PET/CT and SPECT/CT studies. Notably, the radiation dose to the patient from CT can be comparable to or exceed that of the administered radiopharmaceutical, underscoring the need for accurate CT dosimetry to optimize imaging protocols. With the increasing use of CT worldwide in both diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine, robust tools are needed to assess patient radiation dose and to satisfy regulatory and human-subject research requirements. To address these needs, we developed MIRDct, a software tool integrated within the MIRDsoft.org radiation dosimetry community platform. The code offers organ model-based CT dosimetry and radiation risk metrics tailored for radiology and nuclear medicine applications. MIRDct relies on user-defined inputs for patient characteristics, scanner specifications, and technique parameters to provide rapid and accurate organ-level dose estimates. The software features built-in scan protocols with scan ranges based on predefined anatomic landmarks and supports user-defined custom scan ranges through an intuitive graphic interface. The code leverages a library of 24 state-of-the-art mesh-type phantoms modeling representative adult and pediatric patients of both sexes, configured in either arms-up or arms-down positioning (2 sexes, 6 ages, 2 arm positions). A precomputed Monte Carlo-based dose-coefficient database derived for this library enables instantaneous computation of organ-absorbed doses, effective dose, dose-length product, and size-specific dose estimates. MIRDct also provides risk-related metrics, including detriment-weighted dose, lifetime attributable risk, and risk index, and incorporates optional uncertainty quantification and error propagation to provide a quantitative indicator of estimate reliability. Dose estimates from MIRDct were benchmarked and compared across 4 scan protocols with other available codes (the National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for computed tomography and VirtualDose), demonstrating reasonable agreement (4%-30% differences for effective dose). Version 1.1, available at MIRDsoft.org, presents all underlying calculations through a transparent spreadsheet-based implementation and offers advanced features to support CT protocol optimization, deepen dosimetry insight for patient-care-related evaluations, and aid in quality assurance.

Indexed as

RadiometrySoftwareTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildFemaleHumansRadiation Dosagecomputational phantomsCT dosimetrydosimetry softwareorgan-absorbed dose

Identifiers

PMID41679920
PMCPMC13041616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.