ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2026
MIRD Pamphlet No. 34, Part 1: MIRDct-A Customizable Software Tool for CT Dosimetry.
Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MIRD Pamphlet No. 34, Part 2: Benchmarking of MIRDct Software for CT Organ Dose Estimation.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- MIRD Pamphlet No. 34, Part 1: MIRDct-A Customizable Software Tool for CT Dosimetry.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Technical note: The UF/MSK pediatric mesh-based computational human phantom library: applications to organ dosimetry in computed tomography.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Survey of normalized CTDIJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
X-ray CT has long played a critical role in diagnostic radiology and is also a fundamental component of hybrid imaging in nuclear medicine, providing essential information for anatomic localization of radiopharmaceutical uptake and attenuation correction for PET/CT and SPECT/CT studies. Notably, the radiation dose to the patient from CT can be comparable to or exceed that of the administered radiopharmaceutical, underscoring the need for accurate CT dosimetry to optimize imaging protocols. With the increasing use of CT worldwide in both diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine, robust tools are needed to assess patient radiation dose and to satisfy regulatory and human-subject research requirements. To address these needs, we developed MIRDct, a software tool integrated within the MIRDsoft.org radiation dosimetry community platform. The code offers organ model-based CT dosimetry and radiation risk metrics tailored for radiology and nuclear medicine applications. MIRDct relies on user-defined inputs for patient characteristics, scanner specifications, and technique parameters to provide rapid and accurate organ-level dose estimates. The software features built-in scan protocols with scan ranges based on predefined anatomic landmarks and supports user-defined custom scan ranges through an intuitive graphic interface. The code leverages a library of 24 state-of-the-art mesh-type phantoms modeling representative adult and pediatric patients of both sexes, configured in either arms-up or arms-down positioning (2 sexes, 6 ages, 2 arm positions). A precomputed Monte Carlo-based dose-coefficient database derived for this library enables instantaneous computation of organ-absorbed doses, effective dose, dose-length product, and size-specific dose estimates. MIRDct also provides risk-related metrics, including detriment-weighted dose, lifetime attributable risk, and risk index, and incorporates optional uncertainty quantification and error propagation to provide a quantitative indicator of estimate reliability. Dose estimates from MIRDct were benchmarked and compared across 4 scan protocols with other available codes (the National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for computed tomography and VirtualDose), demonstrating reasonable agreement (4%-30% differences for effective dose). Version 1.1, available at MIRDsoft.org, presents all underlying calculations through a transparent spreadsheet-based implementation and offers advanced features to support CT protocol optimization, deepen dosimetry insight for patient-care-related evaluations, and aid in quality assurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.