Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41678894›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Crude protein and amino acid digestibility values in broilers for different soybean varieties and/or maturity groups.

Alexis McDade, Md Raihanul Hoque, Virginia R Sykes, Ali Taheri, Samuel Nahashon, Pramir Maharjan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexis McDadeDepartment of Food & Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture. Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.
Md Raihanul HoqueDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77840, USA.
Virginia R SykesDepartment of Plant Sciences, Variety Testing & Agroecology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Ali TaheriDepartment of Food & Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture. Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.
Samuel NahashonDepartment of Food & Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture. Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.
Pramir MaharjanDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77840, USA. Electronic address: pramir.maharjan@ag.tamu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybeans are the primary protein ingredient source in poultry diets fed as soybean meals (SBM). In a typical corn-soy-based poultry (broiler) diet, SBM contributes up to 70% of dietary crude protein (CP), which dictates the significance of quantity and quality of protein/amino acids (AA) in SBM in dietary formulation. The objective of these studies was to evaluate different varieties of soybean from different maturity groups based on amino acid and protein digestibility in vitro and in-vivo experiments. The soybean varieties that are considered in this study were from different MGs, including MG 3, MG 4, MG 4.5, and MG 5, which are mostly grown in the southeastern region of the United States. First, an in vitro study was conducted using a multi enzyme approach mimicking broiler gut digestion processes to evaluate the digestibility of soybean meal (full-fat and defatted SBM) from 12 different varieties. Second, an in-vivo study with four varieties representing four different maturity groups was selected. A total of 144 birds (Cobb 500) were randomly divided into 4 dietary treatments in cages (six replicate cages per treatment). Semi-purified treatment diets were formulated as follows: TRT1, diet formulated with MG 3 soybean meal; TRT2, diet formulated with MG 4 soybean meal; TRT3, diet formulated with MG 4.5 soybean meal; and TRT4, diet formulated with MG 5 soybean meal. For both experiments, one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple range test was conducted. The in-vitro results showed the highest digestibility values for amino acids for variety 7 of MG 4.5 group than other varieties (P < 0.05) for full-fat soybeans. The in vivo results showed that the feed conversion ratio (FCR) was lower in TRT3 and TRT4 groups compared to the TRT1 and TRT2 (P = 0.002). Both in-vitro and in-vivo findings implied that soybeans from MGs 4.5 and 5 could have favorable nutritional significance.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsChickensDietary ProteinsDigestionGlycine maxAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietMaleRandom AllocationAmino AcidsDietary Proteinsamino acid digestibilitybroilersmaturity groupSoybean varieties

Identifiers

PMID41678894
PMCPMC12917512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.