Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41678824›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2026

Development and explanation of electrocardiogram-based deep learning for predicting short-term mortality in heart failure patients.

Yan Li, Lixia Cheng, Hongmin Zhou, Hongwei Yu, Zeyuan Liu, Qiuju Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan Li *
Lixia Cheng *
Hongmin Zhou
Hongwei Yu
Zeyuan Liu
Qiuju Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Heart failure mortality has risen sharply after years of decline, highlighting the limitations of current risk assessment tools in accuracy, complexity, and cost, and the need for improved predictive models. To address this gap, we developed and validated a deep learning model to improve short-term mortality prediction in heart failure patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, we leveraged the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database to develop HF-ECGNet, combining an EfficientNet neural network and a Transformer architecture. We also developed a composite model integrating electrocardiogram-based (ECG) predictions and clinical features. We evaluated model performance using the area under the curve (AUC) and other metrics, with gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analyses for interpretability. We conducted comparisons with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores. Results: We analysed a total of 104 844 ECGs from 36 222 admissions. HF-ECGNet achieved an AUC of 0.664 for the first ECG during initial admission, improving to 0.721 for the last ECG. Incorporating three-day ECG data further enhanced performance, with AUCs of 0.691 (first admission) and 0.698 (last admission). HF-ECGNet outperformed NT-proBNP and SOFA. A composite model integrating ECG data and clinical features achieved the highest AUC of 0.725. Grad-CAM identified critical ECG patterns, while SHAP analysis highlighted ECG-derived features as the most influential predictors. Conclusions: HF-ECGNet demonstrates potential as a powerful tool for predicting short-term mortality in heart failure patients. Its innovative architecture and integration of clinical data enable more accurate and interpretable risk stratification. Future multi-centre validation is the critical step to fully ascertain its clinical utility and generalisability.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectrocardiographyHeart FailureAgedFemaleHumansMalePredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID41678824
PMCPMC12900550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.