Trial reportJMIR formative research2026
Strengthening Nonspecialist Health Care Providers' Capacity to Address Mental Health in the Context of Domestic Violence in Nepal: Pre-Post Mixed Methods Training Evaluation.
Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health care providers (HCPs) in public health facilities in low- and middle-income countries, including Nepal, often lack adequate training to manage mental health problems effectively. Objective: This study evaluated the impact of structured mental health training on the knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and psychosocial support skills of nonspecialist HCPs in Madhesh Province, Nepal. Methods: This study is a nested substudy within a larger domestic violence (DV) intervention trial and used a mixed method, pre-post intervention design with a comparison group. A total of 46 nonspecialist HCPs were randomized into 2 groups: group 1 (n=24) received a 10-day comprehensive mental health and violence prevention training; group 2 (n=22) received a 3-day training focused on ethical considerations, the link between intimate partner violence (IPV) or DV and mental health, and available referral services. The training was based on the World Health Organization's Problem Management Plus model, with augmented modules on safety planning and psychosocial support. Changes in knowledge and attitude scores were assessed at baseline, immediately post-training, and at 3-month follow-up. In-depth interviews with participants from group 1 were thematically analyzed. Results: At baseline, nearly 90% of nonspecialist HCPs had not received any prior formal mental health training. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in mental health knowledge, with a greater increase observed in group 1 (mean score 41.33-48.41) compared to group 2 (41.18-44.27). Attitudes toward individuals with mental health problems also improved in both groups, reflected in reductions in social distance and perceived dangerousness scores. Thematic analysis of interviews indicated enhanced confidence and psychosocial support skills, particularly in managing mental health concerns among women experiencing IPV or DV. Conclusions: Structured mental health training significantly improved both knowledge and attitudes among nonspecialist HCPs in public health facilities in Madhesh Province. Participants also reported increased confidence in addressing common mental health concerns. This training model has potential for scale-up in other resource-limited settings to build frontline capacity in managing mental health problems and supporting women experiencing IPV or DV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.