Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41678737›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Enhancing protein structure prediction: evaluating the role of amino acid physicochemical features in homology search.

Saeedeh Akbari Roknabadi, Hadis Ahmadiyan, Limsoon Wong, Somayyeh Koohi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saeedeh Akbari RoknabadiDivision of Computational Science and Technology, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SciLifeLab Campus, Tomtebodavägen 23A, 17165 Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hadis AhmadiyanNo 717, Computer Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Ave., Tehran, Tehran, P.O. Box: 11155-9517, Iran.
Limsoon WongSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, 13 Computing Drive, 117417, Singapore.
Somayyeh KoohiNo 717, Computer Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Ave., Tehran, Tehran, P.O. Box: 11155-9517, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3105-2511

Funding

Kwan Im Thong Hood Cho TempleNational University of Singapore
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models like AlphaFold2 have achieved high accuracy in protein structure prediction, but their homology search step-key to generating multiple sequence alignments (MSAs)-remains computationally expensive and prone to introducing alignment noise. We propose DIAFold, which incorporates amino acid physicochemical properties as a cost-free prefiltering strategy to improve homolog detection by prioritizing biologically meaningful MSAs over exhaustive high-sensitivity searches, using DIAMOND in a fast, single-pass setting. This yields a 5.91× speedup and reduces false positives by up to 37.7× while producing smaller yet higher-quality MSAs and preserving or improving structure prediction accuracy, particularly in low-homology regimes. These gains translate to higher TM-scores in full-chain and domain-level predictions, using fewer computational resources, highlighting the benefits of integrating physicochemical knowledge early in protein structure prediction pipelines.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsComputational BiologyProteinsAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceModels, MolecularPrediction AlgorithmsProtein ConformationSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinAmino AcidsProteinsamino acid physicochemical featureshomology searchLLM-based modelprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID41678737
PMCPMC12900070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.