ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2026
Development and Validation of a Resilience Scale for Nursing Home Staff.
Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNursing home staff experience sustained emotional and physical stress. Existing resilience scales, developed for the general population or hospital-based, do not capture the specific demands of nursing home care, including chronic staffing shortages, emotional labour and end-of-life care complexities. This study developed and validated a resilience scale tailored to nursing home staff.
methodsFollowing DeVellis's scale development guidelines, 26 preliminary items were generated and refined to 21 through expert content validation. Data were collected from 302 nursing home staff (registered nurses, nurse assistants and care workers) employed at 25 nursing homes in Seoul, South Korea, between 1 July and 31 August, 2023. The validity and reliability were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
resultsThe final scale comprised 17 items across four factors: Emotional Self-Regulation and Self-Efficacy; Meaning and Personal Growth through Caregiving; Support-Seeking and Meaning-Based Coping; and Professional Growth Orientation. The model demonstrated good fit (CMIN/DF = 1.76, CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.07; SRMR = 0.08), strong internal consistency (α = 0.88) and significant correlation with CD-RISC (r = 0.68, p < 0.001).
conclusionThis validated context-specific scale reflects the unique resilience of nursing home practices and offers a tool for assessing and strengthening psychological resources among staff in nursing home settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.