ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Claiming confidence: U.S. consumer trust in meat and poultry claims.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the fall of 2024, the Food Safety and Inspection Service updated its guidelines for verifying animal-raising and environment-related claims used on meat and poultry products. Notably, revisions strongly emphasized the inclusion of third-party certifications in the supporting documents. Recent inquiries into claim validity, however, have uncovered improper approvals and compliance issues, prompting increased concerns regarding consumer confidence. This study examined consumer trust across nine claim categories explicitly defined within the guidelines. Data were collected from 1,485 respondents through a web-based survey. A best-worst scaling approach identified the most and least trusted claim categories; these data were analyzed for the entire sample and stratified by household shopping roles and meat consumption frequency. Additional questions assessed knowledge of and trust in certifying agencies (eg, U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA]) and third-party certifiers. The results reveal varying levels of trust, with consumers trusting breed and source/traceability claims most, whereas trust in animal welfare and environment-related claims was lowest. Nonetheless, all nine claim categories received generally low levels of trust. Household food-shopping roles and meat-consumption frequency had little impact on trust. Findings also show that consumers primarily trust the USDA to certify claims, and third-party certifications can enhance trust. This study offers new, quantified insights into consumer trust in food claims for meat and poultry products. While addressing trust issues, the results can guide efforts to improve consumer confidence in animal-raising and environment-related claims through targeted interventions and better labeling practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.