Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41678655›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2026

Developing a Realistic and Cost-Effective Training Model (MaiSurge) for Laparoscopic Hysterectomies to Train and Assess Surgical Skill: Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Anna Maria Brechter, Roxana Schwab, Christoph Dold, Christine Skala, Maria Schröder, Lina Schiestl, Katharina Gillen, Walburgis Brenner, Annette Hasenburg, Mona Wanda Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna Maria BrechterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-7788-4635
Roxana SchwabDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1489-0011
Christoph DoldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-1826-8824
Christine SkalaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0282-8840
Maria SchröderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-7923-9542
Lina SchiestlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-1433-3433
Katharina GillenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3001-5452
Walburgis BrennerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1511-6212
Annette HasenburgDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1547-4968
Mona Wanda SchmidtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9854-8706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery has a flatter learning curve compared to traditional open surgery. Therefore, structured programs and realistic training models are imperative to ensure patients' safety. However, commercially available models are often too expensive or technically unrealistic for continuous surgical training. Objective: The aim of this trial was to develop a cost-efficient and highly realistic uterus model to perform a total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and evaluate its applicability. Methods: A training model (MaiSurge) for a TLH with salpingectomy or adenectomy was developed using a 3D printer and different cast materials. Polyvinyl alcohol was used to allow for the use of electrosurgery. To gather the first validity evidence, novice and expert gynecologists performed a TLH on the model. Operative time as well as surgical performance scores (Hysterectomy-Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills) were compared between both groups. Results: A total of 12 participants in the novice group and 18 participants in the expert group completed the simulation. The experts obtained significantly better modified Hysterectomy-Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scores (mean 74.0, SD 12.9 vs mean 60.3, SD 14.9; P=.049) and performed significantly faster (median 69.5, IQR 49.5-74.3 minutes vs median 37.5, IQR 30.5-38.8 minutes; P<.001). An excellent interrater reliability was observed (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.91). Approximately 92% (11/12) of novices felt that they had improved their surgical performance after training on the MaiSurge uterus model. Overall, all participants agreed that the new MaiSurge uterus model should be integrated into training curricula to improve the performance of residents on TLHs. Conclusions: A new highly realistic and cost-effective training model (MaiSurge) to perform a TLH was developed. The model distinguishes between good and poor laparoscopic performances and, thus, can be used in training as well as assessment of surgical skills. The possibility of simulating even complex laparoscopic procedures in a realistic environment may be an opportunity to train a future generation of gynecologists without compromising patient safety or exhausting the limited availability of operating room time.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHysterectomyLaparoscopySimulation TrainingAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGynecologistsHumansModels, AnatomicProspective Studiesadenectomyassessmentcontrolled trialcost-effectiveelectrosurgerygynecologistsgynecologyhysterectomylaparoscopic hysterectomylaparoscopic surgerypatient safetysalpingectomysurgerysurgical educationsurgical skilltrainingtraining model

Identifiers

PMID41678655
PMCPMC12900277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.