ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Learning to Understand Speech in Babble Noise: The Role of Rhythm Perception in English and Spanish.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePerceptual learning-the ability to improve understanding of degraded speech with exposure-has been shown to occur across languages when speech is masked by stationary noise. However, it is unknown whether this holds for more complex maskers like babble noise, which introduces both energetic and informational masking. Compared to stationary noise, babble has greater rhythmic complexity, which may interfere with listeners' ability to use rhythmic cues for perceptual learning, particularly for stress-timed languages like English. In a previous study, rhythm perception predicted perceptual learning for English-speaking but not Spanish-speaking listeners, suggesting that the role of rhythm in perceptual learning may be language specific; whether this relationship remains in the presence of rhythmically complex babble remains an open question.
methodNative English-speaking and Spanish-speaking listeners (
resultsListeners in both groups showed significant perceptual learning, but Spanish-speaking listeners demonstrated greater intelligibility improvement. Rhythm perception did not predict learning in either group, suggesting that babble noise disrupts rhythm-based perceptual learning strategies.
conclusionThese findings highlight that perceptual learning in babble is influenced by language-specific rhythmic properties and that rhythm perception may play a reduced role in more complex masking conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.