ArticlePloS one2026
A modular and interpretable framework for tabular data analysis using LLaMA 7B: Enhancing preprocessing, modeling, and explainability with local language models.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting whether a patient will attend a scheduled medical appointment is essential for reducing inefficiencies in healthcare systems and optimizing resource allocation. This study introduces a local, LLM-assisted pipeline that uses LLaMA 7B solely to automate semantic preprocessing such as column renaming, datatype inference, and cleaning recommendations while the predictive task is performed by classical machine-learning models. Applied to the Medical Appointment No-Shows dataset, the pipeline spans dataset analysis, feature transformation, classification, SHAP-based explainability, and system profiling. Using LLM-guided preprocessing, the downstream XGBoost classifier achieved an overall accuracy of 80%, with an F1-score of 0.89 for the majority Show class and 0.03 for the minority No-show class, reflecting the strong class imbalance in the dataset. The AUC-ROC reached 0.65 and the precision-recall AUC was 0.87, driven primarily by majority-class performance. SHAP analysis identified waiting days, age, and SMS notifications as the most influential predictors. Overall, the results demonstrate that local large language models can enhance preprocessing and interpretability within an efficient, deployable workflow for tabular prediction tasks, while classical supervised models remain responsible for final prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.