ArticlePloS one2026
Measurement instruments for sexual identity minority stress in adults: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Instruments Used to Measure Sexual Identity Minority Stress: A COSMIN Systematic Review.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ) populations face disproportionate health inequities shaped by minority stress processes. To enable consistent and comparable assessment, this scoping review maps measurement instruments for sexual-identity minority stress. Following PRISMA guidelines, the review involved an extensive literature search across Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, PSYNDEXplus, PTSDpub, Web of Science, the GASP Measures Database and GESIS Open Access Repository for Measurement Instruments (last updated in February 2025), resulting in 39,642 references. Selection criteria focused on instruments measuring minority stress in form of stigmatization, discrimination, victimization, internalized homophobia, expectations of rejection, identity concealment, as well as positive aspects of minority identity among adult LGBQ populations. Gender-identity-related stressors were outside the scope. Only articles in English and German were considered. No restrictions were applied with regard to year of publication or publication medium. A total of 105 instruments with 152 references met the criteria and were included for detailed analysis. The analysis identified a broad spectrum of instruments, predominantly targeting internalized homonegativity and stigmatization. The review also uncovered the risk of jingle-jangle fallacy, attributable to inconsistent naming and definition of constructs across instruments. An underrepresentation of instruments for lesbian, bisexual and non-monosexual populations, and a trend towards instruments emerging from grey literature sources was observed. This scoping review demonstrates a rich diversity in instruments measuring sexual minority stress but reveals gaps in gender inclusivity. The findings emphasize the importance of expanding the scope to include intersectionality and diverse cultural contexts. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021257995.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.