Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41678578›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Measurement instruments for sexual identity minority stress in adults: A scoping review.

Maria Misevic-Kallenbach, Susann Conrad, Simone Freitag, Anja Jacobs, Jacqueline Schirm, Madlen Sixtensson, Petra Warschburger

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Misevic-KallenbachDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-4965
Susann ConradIndependent Researcher, Berlin, Germany.
Simone FreitagInstitute of Nursing Care Science and Interprofessional Learning, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Anja JacobsThe German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Jacqueline SchirmIndependent Researcher, Schöneiche, Germany.
Madlen SixtenssonIndependent Researcher, Potsdam, Germany.
Petra WarschburgerDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ) populations face disproportionate health inequities shaped by minority stress processes. To enable consistent and comparable assessment, this scoping review maps measurement instruments for sexual-identity minority stress. Following PRISMA guidelines, the review involved an extensive literature search across Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, PSYNDEXplus, PTSDpub, Web of Science, the GASP Measures Database and GESIS Open Access Repository for Measurement Instruments (last updated in February 2025), resulting in 39,642 references. Selection criteria focused on instruments measuring minority stress in form of stigmatization, discrimination, victimization, internalized homophobia, expectations of rejection, identity concealment, as well as positive aspects of minority identity among adult LGBQ populations. Gender-identity-related stressors were outside the scope. Only articles in English and German were considered. No restrictions were applied with regard to year of publication or publication medium. A total of 105 instruments with 152 references met the criteria and were included for detailed analysis. The analysis identified a broad spectrum of instruments, predominantly targeting internalized homonegativity and stigmatization. The review also uncovered the risk of jingle-jangle fallacy, attributable to inconsistent naming and definition of constructs across instruments. An underrepresentation of instruments for lesbian, bisexual and non-monosexual populations, and a trend towards instruments emerging from grey literature sources was observed. This scoping review demonstrates a rich diversity in instruments measuring sexual minority stress but reveals gaps in gender inclusivity. The findings emphasize the importance of expanding the scope to include intersectionality and diverse cultural contexts. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021257995.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesStress, PsychologicalFemaleHomophobiaHumansMaleSocial Stigma

Identifiers

PMID41678578
PMCPMC12900343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.