Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41678563›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Inferring structure and parameters of stochastic reaction networks with logistic regression.

Boseung Choi, Hye-Won Kang, Grzegorz A Rempala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Boseung ChoiKorea University Sejong Campus, Sejong, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7512-118X
Hye-Won KangUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Grzegorz A RempalaThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-4555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying network structure and estimating reaction parameters remain central challenges in modeling chemical reaction networks. In this work, we develop likelihood-based methods that use multinomial logistic regression to infer both stoichiometries and network connectivity from full time-series trajectories of stochastic reaction systems. When molecular counts for all species are observed, stoichiometric coefficients can be recovered provided that each reaction occurs at least once during the sampling window and has a unique stoichiometric vector. We illustrate the proposed regression approach by recovering the network structure in three stochastic models involving catalytic interactions in open networks-namely, the Togashi-Kaneko model, a heat-shock protein network model, and a Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) epidemic model. We then demonstrate the practical value of the method using synthetic epidemic data designed to mirror key features of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Greater Seoul area of South Korea. In this example, we analyze an SIR network model with demographic effects and address partial observability-specifically, the fact that only infection counts are observed-by combining Bayesian logistic regression with differential-equation modeling. This integrated framework enables reliable recovery of core SIR parameters from a realistic, COVID-like synthetic trajectory of disease prevalence. Overall, our results show that relatively simple likelihood-based tools, such as logistic regression, can yield meaningful mechanistic insight from both synthetic systems and data that reflect real-world epidemic dynamics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Bayes TheoremHumansLogistic ModelsSARS-CoV-2Stochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID41678563
PMCPMC12900436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.