ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Engaging Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based chatbots in digital health: A systematic review.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring needs and priorities in digital health management for rare disease patients and their caregivers: A mixed-methods study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Review
- Beyond chatbots: generative AI as public health infrastructure and a new Digital Social Determinant of Health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Chatbots as frontline educators in sexual reproductive health rights: evidence, limitations, and ethical considerations.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The healthcare sector is rapidly evolving with the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI). As AI technologies shift from rule-based expert systems to deep learning architectures, AI-based chatbots have emerged as innovative solutions to persistent challenges in the health domain. Given the growing concerns about their effectiveness and ethical implications, as well as the demand to optimise their potential in facilitating health outcomes, this study conducts a systematic review of existing research on AI-based chatbots, focusing on their applications and evaluation. A total of 348 articles, collected from eight databases-PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, IEEE, the ACM Digital Library, Scopus, and Web of Science - 20 of which were analysed. This review identifies four main research areas concerning AI-based chatbots: text quality, clinical efficacy, user engagement, and safety. It also highlights the lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the limited use of theoretical frameworks in evaluating their performance. Future research directions and practical solutions are discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.