ArticlePloS one2026
Assessment of adherence to the World Health Organization's prescribing indicators at the family medicine clinic of a quaternary facility.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To promote rational drug use in developing countries, it is important to assess drug use patterns. This study assessed the drug prescription patterns of the family medicine clinic at the Outpatient Pharmacy of the University of Ghana Medical Centre using the World Health Organization's drug use indicators. An analytic, cross-sectional survey with data extracted from patient's electronic medical records was carried out. Questionnaires were given to all prescribers in the family medicine clinic to evaluate factors related to rational medicine use. Frequencies and percentages were employed for description with further analysis, including Zero-inflated Poisson regression and logistic regression, used to determine associations between variables with a 95% confidence interval. Of the 600 participants whose prescriptions were analyzed, 367 (61.17%) were male and 233 (38.83%) were female. The prescribers interviewed were 3 males and 7 females. The mean number of medications per prescription was 1.4 (SD = 1.61), with antibiotics and injections making up 12.74% (n = 107) and 4.17% (n = 35) respectively. Generic prescriptions were 34.88% (n = 293) and those from the Essential Medicines List (EML) were 72.38% (n = 608). Prescriptions with a record of diagnosis were 50.83% (n = 305). Patients with comorbidities were shown to have a 52.2% lower prevalence rate of the total number of medications prescribed compared to those without comorbidities (p-value <0.001). Female patients have 46.4% reduced odds of being prescribed an antibiotic compared to male patients (p-value 0.012). The odds of a patient with a chronic condition being prescribed an antibiotic is 93.2% more than that of a patient without a chronic condition (p-value = 0.025). Additionally, the prevalence of drugs prescribed from the EML for a patient with a chronic condition is 74.4% lower than that prescribed for patients without a chronic condition (p-value = 0.048). There was moderate adherence to rational prescribing. Three prescribing indicators met reference standards, these were: average number of medicines per encounter, percentage of prescriptions with an injectable and percentage of encounters with antibiotics. Rational drug prescribing may be enhanced through training, guidelines, EML distribution, drug and therapeutics committee support and integrated Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.