ArticlePloS one2026
Identifying avian influenza hotspots in wild birds in the Netherlands.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) threatens wild and domestic birds, mammals, and humans. The global spread of HPAI through wild birds requires timely, spatially accurate detection for enhanced preventive measures. However, detecting outbreaks in wildlife is challenging due to reliance on opportunistic sampling and testing of small numbers of wild animals, resulting in insufficient data on the temporal and geographical distribution of infections. We aimed to create a HPAI hotspot prediction model for the Netherlands, using wild bird mortality reports and confirmed HPAI incidents from 2016-2022. Variables for human, wild bird, and sampling density were used as statistical adjusters in various combinations. The Bayesian binomial model employed a case-crossover design, where HPAI incidents in wild birds were cases, and controls used the same date and location as the case but transposed to 2019, when no HPAI was reported in the Netherlands. We tested 24 models in a ten-fold cross-validation design. The best model had an area under the curve score of 0.68, a sensitivity of 0.47, and a specificity of 0.79, and included wild bird mortality and density. The yearly spatial distribution of predicted wild bird HPAI outbreak areas generally matched laboratory-confirmed HPAI cases, especially from 2020 onward, except for an atypically intensively sampled area west of Amsterdam before 2020. Most HPAI outbreak predictions occurred from October through March. Our model highlights potential HPAI outbreak areas over time and can be used to direct sampling efforts, potentially increasing both effectiveness and timeliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.