Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41678506›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2026

Evaluation of rotavirus, pneumococcal conjugate and human papillomavirus vaccination in four Pacific island countries: A cost-effectiveness modelling study.

Natalie Carvalho, Emma Watts, Victoria L Oliver, Andrew Clark, Murat Hakan Ozturk, Siale Akauola, Clare Whelan, Take Naseri, Kylie Jenkins, Inez Mikkelsen-Lopez and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Natalie CarvalhoMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5599-2209
Emma WattsAsia-Pacific Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Victoria L OliverMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7023-5329
Andrew ClarkLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-5991
Murat Hakan OzturkUNICEF Pacific Islands Office, Suva, Fiji.
Siale AkauolaMinistry of Health, Tofoa, Tonga.
Clare WhelanMinistry of Health, Funafuti, Tuvalu.
Take NaseriMinistry of Health, Apia, Samoa.
Kylie JenkinsTelethon Kids, Perth, Australia.
Inez Mikkelsen-LopezAsian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City, Philippines.
Ki Fung Kelvin LamAsian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City, Philippines.
Rommel RabanalAsian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City, Philippines.
Ross McLeodeSYS Development, Sydney, Australia.
Mark JitLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6658-8255
Fiona M RussellAsia-Pacific Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of rotavirus vaccine (RVV), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) and human papillomavirus vaccine (HPVV) has been slow in Pacific Island Countries, particularly among middle-income countries. To assist decision-making on the simultaneous introduction of these three vaccines, cost-effectiveness and budget impact evaluations were undertaken in Samoa, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu, using locally relevant data. METHODS AND

findingsA proportionate outcomes model was used to evaluate vaccine introduction in each country from a health systems perspective, using country-specific data supplemented with regional and global estimates. A 10-year vaccination program was modelled from 2021, with costs and outcomes (disability-adjusted life years [DALYs]) summed over a life-time horizon and discounted at 3%. Vaccine dose costs were based on Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Revolving Fund prices, with lower-priced products also explored. Introduction of all three vaccines in all countries could prevent over 1,000 deaths over the lifetimes of the vaccinated cohorts. The cost per DALY averted at PAHO Revolving Fund prices ranged from 42% to 73% of the per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in each country, and 15% to 58% for lower-priced vaccines. The budget impact ranged from 359% (Samoa) to 1,368% (Vanuatu) of the 2019 vaccine budgets, and 149% (Samoa) to 775% (Vanuatu) for lower-priced vaccines. Cost-effectiveness results were most sensitive to disease burden, discount rate, vaccine efficacy, and program costs. A limitation of our study is the reliance on data from Fiji to inform disease burden, as availability of country-specific data was limited.

conclusionsWith development partner support, introduction of HPVV, PCV and RVV may represent good value for money in Samoa, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu, depending on willingness to pay thresholds. However, inclusion of these three vaccines will place considerable burden on immunisation budgets. Financial sustainability requires increases in immunisation budgets and negotiation of affordable vaccine prices. This analysis provides evidence of the benefit of introducing new vaccines, but shows the importance of affordable pricing to ensure sustainability for small Pacific Island countries.

Indexed as

Mass VaccinationPapillomavirus InfectionsPneumococcal InfectionsRotavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedChild, PreschoolCost-Effectiveness AnalysisCost of IllnessDisability-Adjusted Life YearsEpidemiological ModelsFemaleHumansInfantMalePapillomavirus VaccinesPneumococcal VaccinesRotavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID41678506
PMCPMC12900362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.