Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41678470›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Target switching in 2D and 3D visual foraging reveals trade-offs between mental effort, travelling distance and movement speed.

Emre Orun, Robin J Green, Carlo De Lillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emre OrunSchool of Psychology and Vision Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2601-0860
Robin J GreenSchool of Psychology and Vision Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2615-4409
Carlo De LilloSchool of Psychology and Vision Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-4795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many everyday activities entail searching for multiple desired items and can be conceptualised as foraging. They require mental effort to keep each item in memory, while searching. An instantiation of such activities in experimental psychology is visual foraging, where people search for multiple target categories among distractors. In visual foraging, high frequencies of switching between selections of two different target categories suggest the use of mentally effortful strategies, which require sustained simultaneous use of working memory templates for each of them. As humans often strive to reduce mental effort in cognitive tasks, a key theoretical issue is the characterisation of what induces people to spontaneously increase the frequency of switching between target categories. In five experiments, we systematically manipulated variables in instances of foraging in 2D and 3D virtual reality environments to assess changes in target switching frequency and its determinants. Experiment 1 showed that humans switch more when foraging in large immersive navigational environments, than in visual arrays seen from a bird's eye view. Further experiments clarified that: 1) inter-target distance and movement speed are the critical determinants of strategy changes in a 2D small-scale environment; 2) distance affects the frequency of switching more than speed, in a 3D navigational environment. These results indicate that people spontaneously choose to endure mental costs to meet the demands of different naturalistic instances of foraging. They support theories postulating a flexible use of working memory templates.

Indexed as

Visual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMovementVirtual RealityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41678470
PMCPMC12900363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.