ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Application of a Non-Clamping Sutureless Technique Combined with Radiofrequency Ultrasound Scalpel in Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery for T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bipolar electrocautery hemostasis in sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for exophytic small renal masses under zero-ischemia: a retrospective single-center experience.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess renal cell carcinoma (RCC) complexity using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and evaluate the feasibility and safety of the non-clamping sutureless technique combined with a radiofrequency ultrasound scalpel (RFUS) for low-complexity RCC.MethodsThis retrospective, multi-center cohort study categorized patients into three groups: Group I (suture laparoscopic partial nephrectomy [LPN] with clamping renal artery), Group II (sutureless LPN without renal artery clamping, combined with monopolar electrocoagulation), and Group Ⅲ (sutureless laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery [LNSS] without renal artery clamping combined with RFUS). Key outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, serum creatinine (Scr) levels, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of the affected kidney. Post hoc power analysis was used to evaluate eGFR variation across groups, and a multiple linear regression model was employed to analyze factors influencing postoperative eGFR alterations.ResultsThe study included 60 patients with exophytic and low-complexity RCC. Blood loss in Group III was comparable to that in Group I but less than that in Group II (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.