GuidelineJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2026
European S2k guidelines on management of autoimmune blistering diseases in children and adolescents.
Guideline in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- European S2k guidelines on management of autoimmune blistering diseases in children and adolescents.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Guideline
- Bridging the gap between the clinical need and drug approval in paediatric auto immune blistering diseases.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Article
- Case Report: Nicotinamide monotherapy for infantile bullous pemphigoid with long-term follow-up.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAutoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) in children and adolescents present a major challenge in diagnosis and management because of their rarity and the presence of other differential diagnoses with blistering. They are potentially serious, and timely diagnosis and optimal management can help prevent morbidity related to both the diseases and their treatments.
methodsThe Autoimmune Blistering Diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) has initiated evidence-based, expert-informed clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of paediatric AIBDs. A writing group conducted a systematic review of the available literature on AIBDs in children and adolescents, and since there is limited strong evidence in the literature, recommendations were formulated by consensus over three rounds of structured feedback and revision by the Core Group and Expert Group of the task force (32 voting experts; >75% agreement threshold).
resultsAlthough all AIBDs-including intra-epidermal and subepidermal blistering disorders-are reported in children, linear IgA dermatosis (LAD) is the most common (42-83%). The diagnostic approach in the paediatric age group does not differ from that in adults. Treatment recommendations are tailored to paediatric patients, taking into account developmental pharmacokinetics, potential adverse effects and the impact of disease and therapy on quality of life.
conclusionsThese guidelines provide the first comprehensive, paediatric-focused framework for the diagnosis and management of AIBDs. Implementing the recommendations should harmonize care, reduce treatment-related toxicity and improve quality of life for affected children while steering future research towards critical knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.