Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
FDA Approval Summary: Durvalumab for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.
Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03732677 (A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Global Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab in Combination With Gemcitabine+Cisplatin for Neoadjuvant Treatment Followed by Durvalumab Alone for Adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Global Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab in Combination With Gemcitabine+Cisplatin for Neoadjuvant Treatment Followed by Durvalumab Alone for Adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
On March 28, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved durvalumab (Imfinzi, AstraZeneca) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as neoadjuvant treatment, followed by single-agent durvalumab as adjuvant treatment following radical cystectomy (RC), for adults with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Substantial evidence of effectiveness was obtained from NIAGARA (NCT03732677), a randomized, phase III, open-label trial in cisplatin-eligible patients with MIBC who had not received prior systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy. A total of 1,063 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive neoadjuvant durvalumab + gemcitabine and cisplatin prior to RC, followed by adjuvant durvalumab (GC-D), or neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) prior to RC, with no subsequent adjuvant treatment. The dual primary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR), both per blinded independent central review. The key secondary endpoint (α-controlled) was overall survival (OS). GC-D demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in EFS compared with GC at the second interim analysis, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56-0.82; P < 0.0001]. The median EFS was not reached (NR) for GC-D and was estimated to be 46.1 months (95% CI, 32.3-NR) for GC. There was no statistically significant difference in the pCR rate between the arms. A statistically significant improvement in OS was observed for GC-D compared with G + C, with an HR of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.93; two-sided P = 0.0106). The median OS was NR in both arms. Safety seemed consistent with the safety profile demonstrated in prior trials of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.