ReviewAnnual review of clinical psychology2026
Objective Assessment in Clinical Psychological Science: Progress in Wearable Alcohol Biosensors.
Review in Annual review of clinical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regarding: 'qualitative analysis of out-of-hospital self-management capabilities and ongoing care needs in patients with gynecological malignancies and venous thromboembolism'.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Using Mobile Technology to Study Episodes of Alcohol Self-Administration in Daily Life: A Narrative Review.Current addiction reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical psychology is a discipline reliant on self-reports but uniquely susceptible to specific biases associated therewith. Here we provide a prototype for objective behavioral assessment drawn from the field of alcohol science, describing an emerging class of wearable transdermal biosensor. We note the challenges of transdermal alcohol assessment and describe recent performance gains from updated devices and machine learning analytic tools. We indicate unanswered questions for transdermal technology, including device longevity and the accuracy of devices for producing fine-grained estimates of drinking quantity. We identify factors that can impede development of transdermal sensors and other new objective measures, including the tendency to judge new tools against an implicit ideal, and consider scientific findings divorced from methodology. Finally, in evaluating novel objective measurement tools, we argue for careful consideration of not only error magnitude but also error type (i.e., random versus systematic), identifying measurement diversification as a priority for clinical psychology moving forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.