ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2026
Semantic knowledge and hierarchical event structure can scaffold memory for temporal order.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Event segmentation and encoding rely on information accumulated over different temporal scales.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Cancer Treatment and Memory in Breast Cancer Survivors: Differential Effects on Detailed Episodic and Gist-Like Memory Recall Over Time.Hippocampus · 2026Article
- Article
- Aging and memory for temporal order in naturalistic events.Psychology and aging · 2026Article
- The temporal organization of memory and emotion is reciprocally coupled.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remembering the temporal dynamics of past experiences helps people plan for the future. Previous studies using discrete pictorial stimuli showed that people are better at remembering the temporal order of items occurring within the same perceptual context than items spanning across a contextual boundary, suggesting that event segmentation can structure temporal order memory by resetting item-level binding mechanisms. However, in meaningful everyday scenarios, other mechanisms may play equal or greater roles: Two potentially powerful candidates are hierarchical event structure and knowledge about typical temporal order. In a pair of experiments testing order memory with both short (2.5-min) and longer (20-min) delays, we presented narratives that described everyday activities with semantic constraints on order for fine-grained actions or for coarse-grained activity units. Constraints on either level improved order memory, at both delays. In some cases, this reversed the typical finding that temporal order memory within events is better than across events. An additional experiment revealed that serial recall was chunked based on coarse-level event membership and that semantic order constraints helped organize recall order. A final experiment showed that even in the absence of semantic constraints on coarse-grained activity, participants could use episodic memory for coarse-grained order to constrain memory for fine-grained order, given accurate source memory. Collectively, these results provide evidence for important roles played by hierarchical event structure and prior knowledge in scaffolding reconstructive memory, indicating that reconstruction processes use multiple sources of information in addition to simple episodic associations between fine-grained units. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.