Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41678232›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of applied psychology2026

What's your 5 to 9? Antecedents and outcomes of profiles of daily recovery experience trajectories across the evening.

Ryan S Grant, Kristen M Shockley, Fadel K Matta, Malissa A Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of applied psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan S GrantDepartment of Psychological Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.ORCID 0009-0003-1192-2393
Kristen M ShockleyDepartment of Management and Entrepreneurship, Auburn University.
Fadel K MattaDepartment of Management, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia.
Malissa A ClarkDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia.

Funding

Auburn University; Harbert College of BusinessCDC HHSNIOSH CDC HHSNIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008438University of South Florida; Sunshine Education and Research Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every day at work employees are faced with resource depleting demands, necessitating recovery after work to avoid health and well-being detriments. Recovery theory and empirical results suggest that the four main recovery experiences that underlie employee recovery-psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control-can occur concurrently. At the same time, each of these recovery experiences are dynamic and change across the evening. However, previous recovery research has not investigated and empirically examined both notions at the same time. Using a combined person-centered, dynamic approach across two experience sampling studies, we examine daily profiles of trajectories of all four recovery experiences across an entire evening after work. We also examine how daily job demands and resources relate to these profiles, and how profile membership relates to next-day work and well-being outcomes. Results revealed three profiles of recovery experience trajectory combinations that were predicted by job demands and resources. Results also revealed that having psychological detachment, relaxation, and control experiences early and often across the evening results in the most optimal daily recovery process for next-day well-being. This work represents an important stride forward as it is the first to examine

Indexed as

EmploymentRelaxationSelf-ControlAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychological Well-Being

Identifiers

PMID41678232
PMCPMC12904252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.