ArticleJAMA network open2026
Use of Clinical Notes to Assess Neuropsychiatric Events After Montelukast Initiation.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Prior drug safety studies investigating the risk of neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) after montelukast initiation have been limited by methodological issues, including incomplete confounder control and unmeasured outcomes associated with completeness of structured data, as well as events recorded only in unstructured clinical notes. Objective: To examine the value associated with using linked claims and electronic health records (EHRs) (structured and unstructured data) while investigating the risk of any NPE among patients with asthma initiating montelukast compared with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used Oracle EHR Real-World Data linked to a national US claims dataset (July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2022) to identify patients aged 6 to 80 years with asthma newly initiating montelukast or ICSs. The data were analyzed between December 13, 2022, and August 2, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of any NPE and covariates was assessed using the incremental addition of each data source: analysis 1, claims-only data; analysis 2, claims plus structured EHR data; and analysis 3, claims plus structured and unstructured EHR data. Cox proportional hazard regression models using propensity score-matched cohorts across data sources were used to examine the risk of any NPE by treatment initiation group. Results: Among 109 076 patients (mean [SD] age at treatment initiation, 28.8 [20.5] years, 59.4% female), 39 665 (36.4%) initiated montelukast and 69 411 (63.6%) ICSs. Incidence rates per 100 person-years of the first postindex NPE increased with additional data sources for both montelukast and ICS users (analysis 1, 17.11 [95% CI, 16.86-17.36] vs 15.57 [95% CI, 15.34-15.80], respectively; analysis 2, 19.10 [95% CI, 18.83-19.38] vs 18.23 [95% CI, 17.97-18.50], respectively; analysis 3, 27.78 [95% CI, 27.43-28.13] vs 27.40 [95% CI, 27.06-27.75], respectively). Hazard ratios were attenuated across contributing data sources for analysis 1 (1.08 [95% CI, 1.05-1.11]), analysis 2 (1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.06]), and analysis 3 (1.01 [95% CI, 1.00-1.03]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that clinical information from linked claims and structured and unstructured EHR data was associated with enriched measurement of patient and disease characteristics and enhanced completeness of evidence vs claims data alone. The findings, however, did not differ substantially across the incrementally contributing data sources or from prior studies. Drug safety and effectiveness studies should integrate information using clinical notes from EHRs with consideration of potential limitations, challenges, and necessary validation processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.