ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Can organosulfur metabolites used for parasite control be effectively delivered through cattle drinking water? - A case study.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ruminant production relies on effective parasite control to maintain animal health and productivity. In extensive grazing systems, challenges in administering traditional treatments have led to growing interest in alternative solutions. Therefore, this study aims to explore whether garlic-derived organosulfur metabolites can be delivered through drinking water on a Commercial Cattle Station. A trial was conducted, under an animal ethics protocol ID SA 2025/03/979, on a Commercial Cattle Station in Queensland, Australia, using two large paddocks with similar stocking rates, where 266 cows had ad libitum access to forage and water-based supplements. Both groups received the same basal diet, but only the treated group received additional organosulfur compounds (uDEFENCE®) via their drinking water. Cows in the treated paddock consumed an average of 96.8 L of water and 142mL of uDEFENCE® per head per day after treatment began. Fly counts from digital images were performed by four different counters and showed high average correlation (0.93) among counters, confirming consistency in visual assessments. When interpreted both fly counting and defensive behaviours numbers suggest that water-based supplement acted to mitigate in certain levels the buffalo fly burden. Although conducted under commercial conditions with limited replicability, the research demonstrated that organosulfur compounds can be effectively delivered via drinking water. These findings offer a promising, sustainable alternative to chemical treatments, warranting further research to confirm efficacy and stability organosulfur compounds delivered via drinking water are crucial for depth and better understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41678087What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.