ArticleMolecular diversity2026
ChronicDPipredictor: an interpretable deep learning framework for chemical chronic and subchronic toxicity assessment.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic and subchronic toxicity are very important endpoints for evaluating the long-term and medium-term toxicity of chemical substances. However, due to the complex mechanism and diverse chemical structures, developing effective computer models remains a significant challenge. In this study, we developed ChronicDPipredictor, an interpretable machine learning framework for chemical chronic and subchronic toxicity assessment. Among three fingerprint representations (MACCS, PubChem, and KRFP), models based on MACCS fingerprints achieved the best performance, with accuracies up to 0.82 for chronic and 0.80 for subchronic toxicity in three-class classification. When using these three-class models for the binary classification of toxic and non-toxic substances, the overall prediction accuracy for the chronic toxicity and subchronic toxicity of the compounds reached 0.93 and 0.83 respectively, also showing excellent predictive ability. The SHAP analysis was applied to enhance interpretability. We implemented the ChronicDPipredictor framework as a web-server for predicting the chronic and subchronic toxicity of compounds, which can be freely accessed and used via http://ChronicDPi.sapredictor.cn/ . Furthermore, we systematically extracted structural alerts (18 for chronic toxicity and 7 for subchronic toxicity) from KRFP fingerprints. Several representative alerts, such as nitrobenzene, phenylhydrazine, and triazole derivatives, were supported by established toxicological mechanisms, including oxidative stress, DNA damage, enzyme inhibition, and metabolic disruption. This study provides an interpretable and practical method for assessing chronic and subchronic toxicity, which is quite helpful for the risk assessment of compound repeated-dose toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41678082What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.