Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41678061›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2025

Awake speech recordings for machine learning diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.

Esther Yanxin Gao, Yunrui Hao, Nicole Kye Wen Tan, Adele Chin Wei Ng, Zhou Hao Leong, Chu Qin Phua, Thun How Ong, Leong Chai Leow, Guang-Bin Huang, Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Esther Yanxin Gao *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2311-7845
Yunrui Hao *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8006-5263
Nicole Kye Wen TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2597-9142
Adele Chin Wei NgDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, SingHealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4203-0972
Zhou Hao LeongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, SingHealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore General Hospital (SGH), Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1390-6445
Chu Qin PhuaSingHealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4434-8258
Thun How OngSingHealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9753-2000
Leong Chai LeowSingHealth Duke-NUS Sleep Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3384-4854
Guang-Bin HuangSchool of Automation, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2480-4965
Benjamin Kye Jyn TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. benjamintankyejyn@u.nus.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9411-6164
Song Tar TohYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. toh.song.tar@singhealth.com.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-2077-2457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent but underdiagnosed condition linked to serious health risks. Due to the limited accessibility of polysomnography (PSG), AI (Artificial Intelligence)-based speech analysis has gained attention as a non-invasive screening tool. This Bayesian meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of AI models trained on awake speech and examines factors affecting performance.

methodsWe systematically searched Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases. Eligible studies included adults with OSA diagnosis via in-lab polysomnography or home sleep apnea tests and evaluated AI models using speech recordings. Models evaluated using random-split test sets or k-fold cross-validation were included in a Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression. Publication bias was examined using a selection model approach, while risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed with QUADAS-2 and GRADE.

resultsFrom 6,254 screened articles, 8 studies comprising 24 AI models, trained and tested on 1,060 and 825 participants were included. All studies used professional microphone recordings in the controlled hospital settings. AI models analysing awake speech recordings demonstrated pooled sensitivity and specificity of 82.9% (95% CrI: 80.0-86.4%) and 83.3% (95% CrI: 80.7-86.1%), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 24.3 (95% CrI: 18.2-35.0). Higher mean age improved sensitivity. No significant effects were seen for OSA severity, model type, OSA prevalence, or male percentage. Publication bias was not evident.

conclusionAI models trained on awake speech recordings demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy for OSA and hold potential as a practical, scalable screening tool in both clinical and community-based settings.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSpeechBayes TheoremHumansPolysomnographyWakefulnessMachine learningSleep apnoea syndromeSound recordings

Identifiers

PMID41678061
PMCPMC12994956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.