ReviewJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2026
Research priorities to improve classification of sleep-wake disorders.
Review in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insomnia disorder at 6 weeks postpartum: a prospective study.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objectives of this paper are to identify areas of data deficiencies most relevant to classification of sleep-wake disorders, present existing evidence that informs decisions, and suggest research goals to elucidate classification decisions.
methodsA panel of experts in nosology, consisting of ICSD-3-TR task force members and work group chairs, identified key questions related to the classification of sleep disorders. The panel reviewed the literature based on systematic and targeted searches and developed research priorities to address these questions.
resultsNumerous unresolved issues were identified following preparation of ICSD-3-TR, including whether insomnia with objective short sleep duration should be a formal subtype of chronic insomnia disorder and nocturnal muscle cramps should be removed as a sleep–wake disorder. In addition, the panel identified the following issues for inclusion: (1) defining diagnostic metrics for COMISA, (2) refining metrics for obstructive sleep apnea and subtypes, (3) clarifying the pathological significance of central sleep apnea, (4) subtyping of idiopathic hypersomnia, (5) evaluating circadian biomarkers and subtyping of delayed sleep–wake phase disorder, (6) revising criteria for periodic limb movement disorder, and (7) establishing REM atonia loss thresholds for REM sleep behavior disorder Research directions and methodologies are outlined for each area.
conclusionsAccurate diagnosis is essential for effective treatment. Imprecise criteria risk unnecessary or missed treatments. Greater investment in diagnostic research is needed to advance data-driven classification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.