SynthesisInternational ophthalmology2026
Comparing widefield and ultra-widefield optical coherence tomography angiography with fluorescein angiography in diabetic retinopathy: a review.
Synthesis in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultra-widefield optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy: from retinal lesions to choroidal metrics.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major cause of vision impairment worldwide. Widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (WF-OCTA) is a non-invasive alternative to widefield fluorescein angiography (WF-FA) that provides high-resolution imaging of retinal vasculature. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic performance of WF-FA and ultra-widefield (UWF)-FA vs. WF-OCTA and UWF-OCTA in detecting DR-related retinal vascular changes.
methodsA systematic search was conducted, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting quantitative or qualitative findings on microaneurysms (MAs), intra-retinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs), and neovascularization (NV), or foveal avascular zone (FAZ) changes were analyzed.
resultsA total of 12 studies (648 eyes) met the inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that WF-OCTA detect NV with high sensitivity (96.55%) and specificity (94.74%), comparable to WF-FA. However, WF-FA showed potential in certain qualitative aspects, suggesting a possible complementary role.
conclusionWF-OCTA and UWF-OCTA are promising non-invasive alternatives to WF-FA and UWF-FA, offering high diagnostic accuracy, rapid imaging, and depth-resolved vascular analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41677995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.