Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41677946›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2026

Structural and Network Adaptations in Visuospatial Cortical Regions of Elite Soccer Players: A Morphometric and Structural Covariance Network Study.

Jie Chen, Xiaochun Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie ChenSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Xiaochun WangSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China. wangxiaochun@sus.edu.cn.

Funding

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China 21JZDW007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regular physical exercise induces neuroplastic adaptations that may enhance cognitive function. However, the long-term impact of soccer training on brain structure and network organization remains unclear. This study investigated structural brain adaptations in elite soccer players using voxel-based morphometry (VBM), surface-based morphometry (SBM), and structural covariance network (SCN) analysis. High-resolution MRI was acquired from 31 elite soccer players and 30 matched non-athlete controls. Compared to controls, athletes showed increased gray matter volume in the left calcarine sulcus, greater cortical thickness in the left pericalcarine cortex, and reduced sulcal depth in the bilateral precentral gyrus. Cortical thickness in the pericalcarine cortex was positively correlated with training years, while sulcal depth in the right precentral gyrus was negatively associated with weekly training hours. Although global SCN metrics did not differ between groups, athletes exhibited significantly higher nodal efficiency in the right cuneus and right lateral occipital cortex-key regions for visuospatial processing. SCN robustness under targeted and random attacks was comparable across groups. These findings suggest region-specific differences in neuroplasticity and local network efficiency, which may be consistent with the neural efficiency hypothesis and warrant further investigation into the potential role of long-term soccer training in visuospatial processing.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalCerebral CortexSoccerAdultAthletesBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityYoung AdultBrain plasticityElite athleteGraph theoryStructural covariance networkStructural MRI

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.